 |
Evaluation of approaches and scope |
 |
Assist banks in Basel II readiness assessment through the conduct of detailed gap analysis for both SA and IRB approaches: |
| |
 |
Understanding and interpretation of national discretion issues |
| |
 |
Conduct detailed Process Gap Analysis, covering asset classification, credit risk mitigation, internal models, treatment of NPLs and equities, etc, depending on the approach selected |
| |
 |
Conduct detailed Data Gap Analysis to identify data required for RWA computation |
| |
 |
Develop Gap Closure Plan including priorities and any dependency of tasks |
 |
Advise banks on implementation of SA and IRB approaches: |
| |
 |
Definition of policies and processes on asset classification, external ratings, use of internal ratings, credit risk mitigation, etc, in line with the deployment of relevant Basel II-related systems |
| |
 |
User requirements for system enhancements in line with SA and IRB requirements |
| |
 |
Evaluation and selection of RWA computation engine |
| |
 |
Calibration of model outputs |
| |
 |
Preparation for certification by national supervisor |
 |
Credit Rating Model Development and Validation (please refer to section on Credit Risk Management) |
 |
Use Test: In line with Basel II requirements, banks must have a credible track record in the use of internal ratings information in its business and support operations. We provide advice to assist banks in the development of Use Test framework, policies and processes for areas such as: |
| |
 |
Credit Approval |
| |
 |
Limit Management |
| |
 |
Reporting of Credit Risk Information |
| |
 |
Other broader risk management activities, such as provisioning, credit risk appetite, regulatory capital calculation, profitability and performance measurement, etc. |